Jacob Kaplan-Moss

Today I Learned…

3d printed parts have different strength characteristics than conventionally-manufactured parts

An interesting 3d printing lesson about how the physical characteristics of printed parts differ from other manufacturing:

I needed to replace a rubber hydraulic hose retention strap on my tractor. The part’s $40 + shipping – ludicrous for a 6x2" strip of rubber – so perfect to try to replicate. I have some TPU filament that’s of similar flexibility, let’s go.

For V1, I just replicated the geometry exactly - including, without thinking about it, some little relief holes around the main hose holes:

A model of a hose bracket. It's got 4 big holes for hoses, with 4 very small relief holes around the edges of each big hole.

In the original rubber part, these holes serve to weaken the rubber around the hose holes, allowing the strap to be stretch around the hoses. But 3D printing is different: 3d printed parts make a few solid permitter loops around the outside edges of the part, and then weaker sparse patterned “infill” around the rest of the part:

A shot of the same part in the slicer, showing solid filament paths around the relief holes and sparse infill elsewhere.

Thus, in the 3d printed part, these holes actually make the part stronger in those areas — precisely the opposite from the conventionally-manufactured rubber original. Oops!

The fix was to weaken those holes in a different way more suitable to 3d printing:

Version 2 of the part. Instead of the small relief holes, there's now a long cutout running the length of the part, connecting all the hose holes.

(I also used the “grid” infill patterns, on the suggestion of a friend, because it’s weaker in the vertical direction and thus allows the part to flex a bit more than other infill patterns that are designed to be strong in all three dimensions.)